Naïve raises $28.5M Series A to build autonomous company infrastructure

See more ↗
← Benchmarks

TheAgentCompany

Real workplace tasks across code, chat, documents, spreadsheets, and project tools. Every harness ran the same ten-task slice with GLM-5.3-Flash in freshly reset company environments.

Last run: September 2026Task suite: TheAgentCompany ↗

Cost per full completion · same model and task slice

$0.0225 / completion · 26% less than Codex

Vetta fully completed six of ten tasks and earned the highest mean reward in the field. It matched Stock Pi's completion count at 78% lower cost per completion and beat every other harness on both mean reward and completion efficiency. This is a tuned build, chosen on these same ten tasks, so it is not a held-out result.

Efficiency leaderboard?Published harness results on the same benchmark configuration, ordered by measured model cost per successful task.

Agent-model cost per fully completed task. Every published harness used the same tasks, model, provider rate card, and one-attempt protocol.

Vetta$0.0225
Codex$0.0303
Claude Code$0.0346
Hermes$0.0385
Stock Pi$0.102
HarnessCost / successful taskTasks solvedSuccess rateTime / taskInput tokens / taskOutput tokens / taskTurns / task
Vetta$0.02256 / 1060.0%13.3 min643.5k9.1k30.5
Codex$0.03035 / 1050.0%7.1 min794.0k2.9k—
Claude Code$0.03465 / 1050.0%8.1 min765.0k7.4k—
Hermes$0.03855 / 1050.0%14.1 min926.4k15.6k43.8
Stock Pi$0.1026 / 1060.0%7.3 min3.3M2.6k48.1

A full completion is a task with official reward 1.0. Mean reward is the official weighted partial-completion score, so it preserves useful progress on tasks that did not fully complete. This is a matched ten-task study, not the full benchmark leaderboard. Figures come from our internal benchmark database. The trial-level rows are not public yet.

Why we run this benchmark

Coding benchmarks cover only one part of knowledge work. TheAgentCompany requires an agent to move between browser-based business systems, communication tools, office files, and repositories while preserving task intent across a multi-tool workflow.

Methodology

Five harnesses each attempted the same ten TheAgentCompany 1.0.0 task images once. Each attempt received the same prompt, credentials, browser CLI, GLM-5.3-Flash model, low reasoning setting, 90-minute limit, and fresh container, home, browser, and service state. All 50 trials were graded and none were excluded.

Reward and full completion come from the benchmark evaluator. Cost includes the tested harness's measured uncached input, cache-read input, and output tokens repriced on one shared rate card.

The Vetta row is our E00 build. It lets the harness reach files anywhere in the disposable task container, a setting we use only for this benchmark. We chose it on these same ten tasks: the build before it fully completed three. It is on a branch and not yet in the shipped product.

Want to try it? Deploy Vetta or explore the CLI.